Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Amaya et al v. Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Amaya, Luis Miranda and Moises Aleman
Defendant:
Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLC, Infinite Homes Group 218 LLC, Infinite Homes Group 4108 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williston v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Williston
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Dhatt v. Enviva Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
TAJE DHATT
Defendant:
Enviva Inc., John K. Keppler, Michael A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Fagen v. Enviva Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02844
Plaintiff:
David Fagen
Defendant:
Enviva Inc., John K. Keppler and Shai S. Even
Robeson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Shay Robeson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCumber et al v. Invitation Homes, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Teresa Kerr, Francine McCumber, La Shay Harvey and others
Defendant:
Invitation Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robeson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv02303
Plaintiff:
Shay Timeka Robeson
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burrell et al v. 911 Restoration Franchise, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02278
Plaintiff:
Ms. April Burrell, 911 Restoration of Baltimore, Inc., Mr. Donald C Burrell and others
Defendant:
Mr. Idan Shpizear, 911 Restoration Franchise, Inc., Mr. Shay Kalmanovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
