Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Shearer et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08368
Plaintiff:
Brian Shearer and Dawn Shearer
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shearer v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01450
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Shearer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shearer v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00836
Plaintiff:
Jodilyn Shearer
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Muhammed et al v. ABC Television, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04133
Plaintiff:
Ali Muhammed , Marvelous Solano-Rodriguez , Felix Moreno and others
Defendant:
ABC Television, Inc., ABC, Inc., ABC Family, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wieczorek et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00821
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC, BMW of North America, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Campbell, Angel Figuerora, Constantine Kazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Securities and Exchange Commis v. Stratocomm
as 14-1557
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Craig Danzig
Defendant - Appellant:
Stratocomm Corporation and Roger D. Shearer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities and Exchange Commis v. Stratocomm Corporation
as 14-1259
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Craig Danzig
Defendant - Appellant:
Roger D. Shearer and Stratocomm Corporation
Shearer v. Smith
as 13-4558
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gil Shearer
Respondent - Appellee:
Joseph T. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
