Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Patton v. Porter et al
as 2:2018cv02034
Plaintiff:
Ricky D. Patton
Defendant:
Porter, Elliot and Shelby County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wilkerson et al
as 2:2017cv02940
Plaintiff:
Rodrecuz A. Williams
Defendant:
Wilkerson, Jones and Shelby County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Shelby County Detention
as 2:2017cv02724
Petitioner:
Quentin R. Johnson
Respondent:
Shelby County Detention
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2017cv02540
Plaintiff:
Eddie Harris
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, Scott and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2017cv02338
Plaintiff:
Justin O. Fulton
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, Bohanna, McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2016cv03014
Plaintiff:
Justin O. Fulton
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, Harris, Purdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2016cv02996
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Hunter, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, C. Wilkerson, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2014cv02897
Plaintiff:
Rodrecuz A. Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, Williams and R. Hilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2012cv02187
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tate
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, Bass and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. Shelby County Detention Center et al
as 2:2010cv02586
Plaintiff:
James Echols
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Center, Andrew Taber, Jr., Anita Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
