Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Denson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv03835
Petitioner:
David Lee Denson
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00434
Petitioner:
David Lee Denson
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Shelby Smith, Warden of Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03771
Defendant:
Shelby Smith, Warden of Belmont Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Marvin J. Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01265
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Petitioner:
Maurice Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry et al v. Foreman et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Warden Shelbie Smith, Annette Chambers-Smith, R. Battles and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry and Unamed Plaintiff(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benedict v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Joshua Benedict
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shank v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
Patrick J. Shank
Defendant:
Shelby W. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Shelby Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04028
Plaintiff:
Shelby Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoerig v. Smith
as 4:2022cv00300
Petitioner:
Claudia C. Hoerig
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
