Cases 31 - 40 of 61
ZAIRE v. OSBORNE et al
as 2:2021cv19345
Plaintiff:
NAQUEEN ZAIRE
Defendant:
BRADLEY J. OSBORNE, HLADIK, ONORATO & FEDERMAN, LLP, JAMES NG ACKERMAN, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
ESTATE OF JOHNSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv04597
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MARK COPOULOS doing business as BRUCHA HOLDINGS REALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv18488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
OWENS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2021cv03787
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROY OWENS
Defendant:
BRUCE WILLIAMS and SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROSS v. NEWREZ LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02247
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
DALE ROSS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
DUTCHER v. SHELLPOINT PARTNERS LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02062
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and SHELLPOINT PARTNERS LLC
Plaintiff:
ROSS DUTCHER
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
BOWDEN et al v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP et al
as 2:2021cv10134
Defendant:
MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, SELENE FINANCE and SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING LLC
Plaintiff:
LLOYD BOWDEN and JANIS BOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
JACKSON v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING et al
as 5:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
KEITH JACKSON
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING and SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
WEBER et al v. NEWREZ LLC
as 1:2021cv04287
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WEBER, SALLY WEBER and CHRISTOPHER WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
