Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Weaver v. Siegel
as 21-18
Defendant / Appellee:
Roger E. Siegel, Esq., Darrell Parker, Sophia Maloney, AKA Sophia Alleyne and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Everette Weaver
Weaver v. Roger E. Siegel, Esq. et al
as 1:2020cv01082
Defendant:
Shelly Gibbs, Sophia Maloney, John Seymour James, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Everette Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shelly Parker, et al v. DC
as 12-7021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Shelly Parker, Tom G. Palmer, Gillian Saint Lawrence and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dick Anthony Heller
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Shelly Parker, et al v. DC
as 12-7022
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Shelly Parker, Dick Anthony Heller, Tom G. Palmer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia
Thomas et al v. Howrey LLP
as 3:2011cv01729
Plaintiff:
Virginia Thomas , Gail Adams , Roderick Casey and others
Defendant:
Howrey LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker, Shelly, et al v. DC, et al
as 04-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shelly Parker, Dick Anthony Heller, Tom G. Palmer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia and Anthony A. Williams, Mayor of the District of Columbia
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
National Rifle Association Civil Rights Defense Fund, Second Amendment Foundation, Citizen's Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Violence Policy Center, The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Ernest McGill and others
Terminated Party:
Potowmack Institute, Inc. and State of Idaho
PARKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2003cv00213
Plaintiff:
SHELLY PARKER , DICK ANTHONY HELLER , TOM G. PALMER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Amicu:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE , VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER , AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS UNION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
