Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Whitfield v. Sheriff Parnell McNamara
as 6:2022cv01271
Petitioner:
James Roy Whitfield, Jr.
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. McNamara
as 6:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Aaron Maurice Spencer
Respondent:
Sheriff Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fults v. McNamara
as 22-50055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Fults
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Parnell McNamara, James Neyland, Corporal B. Moore and others
Anderson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00781
Petitioner:
Michael Orville Anderson, II
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Sheriff Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fults v. McNamara et al
as 6:2021cv00404
Defendant:
CO FNU Oliver, Nurse FNU Mashell, B. Fabela and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fults
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harlan Jr v. McLennan County, et. al.
as 6:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Rebecca Leibel, McLennan County Sheriffs Office, Louis Giles and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Foster Harlan Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. McNamara
as 20-50117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE D. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY ARMSTRONG, MCLENNAN COUNTY, SHERIFF PARNELL MCNAMARA and others
Boyd v. McNamara et al
as 6:2020cv00059
Defendant:
McLennan County, Robert Dillard, Sheriff Parnell McNamara and others
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. McNamara et al
as 6:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Wayne Flores
Defendant:
McLennan County Jail, Sheriff Parnell McNamara and Jim Deuschtman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. McNamara et al
as 6:2019cv00690
Defendant:
FNU Brown, Captain Mike Garret, FNU Pisarcik and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
