Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Naquin v. Calcasieu Parish et al
as 2:2018cv00560
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Naquin
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish, Tony Mancuso, Robert McCorqudale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Combined Anti-Drug Team et al
as 2:2014cv03443
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Green
Defendant:
Combined Anti-Drug Team and Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daigle v. Combined Anti-Drug Team et al
as 2:2014cv03442
Plaintiff:
Shaun Daigle
Defendant:
Combined Anti-Drug Team and Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cribeiro v. Combined Anti-Drug Team et al
as 2:2014cv03446
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Cribeiro
Defendant:
Combined Anti-Drug Team and Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Kennith W Montgomery
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, City of Lake Charles, Calcasieu Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irby v. Calcasieu Parish et al
as 2:2012cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ronald Millard Irby
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish, Carol Thorton, Inat Blacklidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spell v. Calcasieu Parish et al
as 2:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
Randy James Spell
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish, Keefe Commissary Network Sales Co, Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irby v. Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00771
Plaintiff:
Ronald Millard Irby
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish and Keefe Commissary Network Sales Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muirhed v. Calcasieu Parish et al
as 2:2010cv01813
Plaintiff:
Michael St Abubin Muirhed
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Calcasieu Parish, Joseph Bellow, I N S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
