Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Davis v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Bryce Davis
Defendant:
Mark Dobbs, Rodger Burton, Dave Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Bryce Deshone Davis and Bryce Deshane Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Rodgers, Mike McMean, Dave Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharma v. Shipman et al
as 6:2021cv03151
Defendant:
Wayneco, LLC and George Shipman
Plaintiff:
Narendra Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipman v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00983
Plaintiff:
Donald Shipman
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Fraker et al
as 4:2015cv00529
Plaintiff:
Margaret Moore, C.F. and W.F.
Defendant:
Travis L Fraker, Christine M Fraker, Claude Dale Fraker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Stockdall et al v. TG Investments, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01557
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Stockdall and Christina L Stockdall
Defendant:
TG Investments, Inc., George Shipman and Tina Shipman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stockdall et al v. TG Investments, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Stockdall and Christina L Stockdall
Defendant:
TG Investments, Inc., George Shipman and Tina Shipman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shipman v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00773
Petitioner:
Kandis Karlotta Shipman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Denise Thomas , Rita Byram , Angie MacFarlane and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byram et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00582
Plaintiff:
Rita Byram, Angie MacFarlane, Frankie Nelson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
