Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Michael Eugene Scott v. A. Shittu et al
as 2:2018cv09525
Defendant:
A. Shittu, S. Gates and John B.
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Beregovskay, et al.
as 1:2017cv01146
Plaintiff:
Tiante Dion Scott
Defendant:
Olga Beregovskay, A. Shittu, Ndukwe N. Odeluga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Beregovskay et al
as 4:2017cv03518
Plaintiff:
Tiante Dion Scott
Defendant:
Olga Beregovskay, A. Shittu, Ndukwe N. Odeluga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibarra v. Zamora et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
David Ibarra
Defendant:
L. D. Zamora, T. Brewer, L. Bluford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Daveiga et al.
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
Darren Henderson
Defendant:
K. Daveiga, A. Shittu, M. Seaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Daveiga et al.
as 2:2016cv01466
Plaintiff:
Darren Henderson
Defendant:
K. Daveiga, A. Shittu, M. Seaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Herbert Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Seeley, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kokor, et al.
as 1:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
Horace Mann Williams
Defendant:
Winfred Kokor, M.D., James Jackson, Goodwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearwester v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Dearwester
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, North Kern State Prison, Quest Diagnostics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearwester v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Dearwester
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, North Kern State Prison, Quest Diagnostics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
