Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2018cv01170
Petitioner:
Daryll Shumake
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stinson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00805
Plaintiff:
Alyson Stinson and Carol Shumaker
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc. and Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shumaker v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Marie Shumaker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shumake v. Smith/Dillard
as 7:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daryll Shumake
Defendant:
Kameka Lian Smith/Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 7:2012cv00051
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Lewis T Babcock, Richard H Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shumaker v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Patricia Shumaker
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pardo v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2010cv01417
Plaintiff:
Ramon V. Pardo
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Shipiro & Burson, LLP , Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shumake v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2008cv00398
Plaintiff:
Daryll Keith Shumake
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison and Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shumake v. Watson et al
as 7:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Daryll Keith Shumake
Defendant:
B. Watson, C/O Meade, Sgt. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shumake v. Ben Secours Maryview Medical Center et al
as 1:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
Daryll Shumake
Defendant:
Ben Secours Maryview Medical Center and Euella Mae Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
