Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hughes v. FCI Waseca et al
as 0:2024cv03045
Defendant:
FCI Waseca, Goodin, Koziolek and others
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. v. Quantum-Si Incorporated
as 0:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Benchmark Electronics, Inc and Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
Defendant:
Quantum-Si Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Mr. Arthur's, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv02139
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Cotillion Music, Inc., Terry Stafford Music Co. and others
Defendant:
Mr. Arthur's, Inc. doing business as Cowboy's Saloon and Lawrence Ranallo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fiorito v. Lilo et al
as 0:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Mr. Lilo, SIS Officer Jacobson, SIS Officer Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. Lilo et al
as 0:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Defendant:
Mr. Lilo, SIS Officer Jacobson, SIS Officer Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. FMC Rochester, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv01979
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, Minnesota, Warden Steve Kallis, A female Correctional SiS employ and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Kalichenko v. Barnes et al
as 0:2020cv01646
Defendant:
DOJ Washington, SIS department, Honken and others
Plaintiff:
Olena Kalichenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, Acting Warden and SIS Communication Monitoring System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Cadillacs Northstar Grille, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv03440
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , House of Cash, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Cadillacs Northstar Grille, LLC and Richard A. Schulman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
