Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01679
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
W Charles Robinson v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-73275
: In re: W CHARLES ROBINSON
Petitioner: W CHARLES ROBINSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest: METHVEN AND ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, SCARLETT PARADIES-STROUD, As Administrator of the Estate of Andrew B. Stroud, ANDY STROUD, Inc. and others
Methven and Associates Profess v. Lisa Kelly, et al
as 14-15229
Plaintiff - Appellee: METHVEN AND ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: LISA SIMONE KELLY, as Administrator of the Estate of Nina Simone, WALLY ROKER, DBA ICU Ent. Dist., DBA Wally Roker Music, STEVEN AMES BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellant: SCARLETT PARADIES-STROUD, as administrator of the Estate of Andrew B. Stroud, ANDY STROUD, INC. and STROUD PRODUCTIONS AND ENTERPRISES, INC.
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant: W CHARLES ROBINSON
Lisa Kelly v. Wally Roker, et al
as 13-16150
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: LISA SIMONE KELLY
Defendant: WALLY ROKER, DBA ICU Ent. Dist., DBA Wally Roker Music
Defendant - Appellant: ANDREW B. STROUD and SCARLETT STROUD
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: ANDY STROUD, INC.
Methven & Associates Professional Corporation v. Paradies-Stroud et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01079
Plaintiff: Methven & Associates Professional Corporation
Defendant: Scarlett Paradies-Stroud, Andy Stroud, Inc., Stroud Productions and Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Kelly v. Roker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05822
Plaintiff: Lisa Simone Kelly
Defendant: Wally Roker, Andy Stroud, Inc. and Andrew B. Stroud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?