Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Loynachan, et al. v. Smiley, et al.
as 24-1024
Plaintiff: KEVIN LOYNACHAN, in his individual capacity and as successor-in-interest to Decedent Chad Loynachan and JANICE LOYNACHAN, in her individual capacity and as successor-in-interest to Decedent Chad Loynachan
Defendant: DARLENE SMILEY, in her individual capacity as a law enforcement officer for Siskiyou County
Daniel Wilson v. USDC-CAOAK
as 23-70020
Not Classified By Court: In re: DANIEL K. WILSON, SISKIYOU COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SISKIYOUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Petitioner: DANIEL K. WILSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
American Forest Resource Council, et al v. Martha Williams, et al
as 22-5216
Plaintiff / Appellant: American Forest Resource Council, Association of O&C Counties, Douglas County, Oregon and others
Defendant / Appellee: Martha Williams, Principal Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of Interior
Huguette Young v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-55619
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as attorney general of California, J. KIRK ANDRUS, in his official capacity as district attorney of Siskiyou County, California, CYNTHIA ZIMMER, in her official capacity as district attorney of Kern County, California and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG
Huguette Young v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 21-55567
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as attorney general of California, J. KIRK ANDRUS, in his official capacity as district attorney of Siskiyou County, California, CYNTHIA ZIMMER, in her official capacity as district attorney of Kern County, California and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00601
Defendant: SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Martha Williams and DEBRA HAALAND
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS COUNTY, OREGON, LEWIS COUNTY, SKAMANIA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
(PS) Ruggiero v. Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01561
Defendant: California Sheriff's Department of Siskiyou County, Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, HDQ, NY and Administration for Justice California Superior Court of Siskiyou County
Plaintiff: Nancy Ruggiero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
The Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01419
Amicus Curiae: Klamath Riverkeeper, Hoopa Valley Tribe, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Plaintiff: The Klamath Tribes
Intervenor Defendant: Sunnyside Irrigation District, Klamath Water Users Association and Ben DuVal
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlif, et al
as 17-16500
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior and GREG SHEEHAN, Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor-Defendant: SISKIYOU COUNTY, DOUGLAS COUNTY, Oregon, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and others
Karuk Tribe et al v. Stelle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01079
Defendant: William Stelle , National Marine Fisheries Service , Patricia A. Grantham and others
Plaintiff: Karuk Tribe , Environmental Protection Information Center , Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and others
Intervenor_dft: Siskiyou County , American Forest Resource Council , Gary Rainey and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?