Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Holley v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05982
Plaintiff:
Anthony Holley
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Nadiyah S. Alexander, Sergeant Roy Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Penate v. Celtic Services NYC Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv04863
Defendant:
Kieran Slevin, Celtic Services NYC Inc., White Star NYC Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Fidel Penate
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cass v. The United States District Court, Eastern District of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06071
Defendant:
Robert Sommers, Charles J. Hynes, John K. Jordan, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Cass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Celtic Services NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04777
Defendant:
Celtic Services NYC Inc. and Kieran Slevin
Plaintiff:
Erick Barrientos, Daniel Munoz, Jose Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ainslie et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11293
Plaintiff:
John Lissaris, Frances Dunniway, Faye Balbosa and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Corley v. Farrell et al
as 1:2018cv00763
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Defendant:
Harry J. Farrell, Andrew O'Connell, Lucia E. Pagano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Slevin v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv05785
Defendant:
Carloyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Brian Patrick Slevin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Slevin v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv05785
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Brian Patrick Slevin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
IMS Health Incorporated v. AMP Associates LLC et al
as 1:2016cv07056
Plaintiff:
IMS Health Incorporated
Defendant:
AMP Associates LLC, J. Peter Bardwick, Chris Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corley v. Farrell et al
as 1:2016cv03367
Defendant:
Mary Adamo, Paul Albano, John Capra and others
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
