Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Slone v. JUUL LABS, INC., et al
as 3:2020cv07256
Defendant:
James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Slone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acevedo et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00453
Plaintiff:
Gary Domstead, Robert Hunt, Paul Playfair and others
Defendant:
VM Motori S.p.A., Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Hailee Paxton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08104
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Does and Danielle Thate
Plaintiff:
Constance Edwards, Laureen Green, Paris Hooks and others
August et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03103
Plaintiff:
Clarissa August , Cathleen Bailey , Richard Birdwell and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pandolfo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03100
Plaintiff:
Frank Pandolfo , Victor Manuel Pargas , Zaida M Parker and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Juarez v. Chacon et al
as 3:2011cv04631
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Juarez
Defendant:
R. Chacon, G. Williamson, L. Langran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slone v. Fortson et al
as 3:2008cv01855
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Slone, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen L. Fortson, Gene Mabrery, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv03335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Corbin Slone Reynolds v. Derrick L Ollison
as 2:2007cv00189
Petitioner:
Corbin Slone Reynolds
Respondent:
Derrick L Ollison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
