Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Jason Carrodine v. Snap Finance, LLC
as 2:2026cv01777
Plaintiff:
Jason Carrodine
Defendant:
Snap Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carrodine v. Snap Finance, LLC
as 2:2026cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jason Carrodine
Defendant:
Snap Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bush v. Snap Finance LLC
as 1:2026cv03312
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bush
Defendant:
Snap Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Esquivel v. Snap Finance LLC
as 3:2025cv01157
Plaintiff:
Joe Esquivel
Defendant:
Snap Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Snap Finance et al
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
Snap Finance, Snap RTO, Snap Second Look and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
