Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Martinez-Cordova v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2021cv01204
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner, Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region II, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Edgar E Martinez-Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
VIOLETTE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2019cv00386
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Plaintiff:
JAMIE A VIOLETTE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crespo-Munoz v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2019cv01724
Plaintiff:
Arcenette Crespo-Munoz
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2019cv00141
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F JOHNSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera Collazo v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2019cv01278
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Marisol Rivera Collazo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Maldonado v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2014cv01390
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner, US Attorney General and US Attorney General for the District of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
Jesus Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Ramos Rodriguez v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2011cv01323
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ramos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cordero
as 1:2010cv12104
Plaintiff:
Angel M Cordero
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
CARABALLO SANTIAGO
as 3:2010cv02179
Plaintiff:
DEOVINIA CARABALLO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Sarmento v. Social Security Commissioner
as 1:2010cv11724
Plaintiff:
Maria Sarmento
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
