Cases 1 - 10 of 4,126
Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00609
Plaintiff:
Renata Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wren et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Wren and Donald Wren
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Drake
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kole v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kim Kole
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Molina-Elizona v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Frances Molina-Elizona
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fogle-Jackson v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Angela Fogle-Jackson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, American Medical Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coats v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04541
Plaintiff:
Kathy Coats
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Segal v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04557
Plaintiff:
Elaine Segal
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04371
Plaintiff:
Teresa Miller
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sipich v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04345
Plaintiff:
Joan Sipich
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
