Cases 1 - 10 of 64
United States of America v. Sokol
as 23-6428
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS SOKOL
Finger v. Tyme Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07454
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Tyme Technologies, Inc., Christine D. Baker, David Carberry and others
Lawrence v. Tyme Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Tyme Technologies, Inc., Douglas A. Michels, Christine D. Baker and others
IRWIN v. TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04727
Plaintiff:
JAMES IRWIN
Defendant:
TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DOUGLAS A. MICHELS, CHRISTINE D. BAKER and others
BOU JABBOUR et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
PAUL BOU JABBOUR, RAMESH ADHIKARI, SUREN AKHVERDYAN and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SOKOL WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2021cv02385
Plaintiff:
SOKOL WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Defendant:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
USA v. Eric Sokol
as 21-30170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC MALLARD SOKOL
Tristram Buckley v. BMW of North America, et al
as 20-56397
Defendant / Appellee:
BMW GALLERY, EUROPEAN AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY INC., BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRISTRAM T. BUCKLEY
Tristram Buckley v. BMW of North America, et al
as 20-55769
Defendant / Appellee:
BMW GALLERY, EUROPEAN AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY INC., BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRISTRAM T. BUCKLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
