Cases 1 - 10 of 24
(PC) Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv02348
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allen and Warden of Solano State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Rodriguez v. Warden, Solano State Prison et al
as 2:2021cv00622
Defendant:
CDCR Add Seg Officers, Medical Staff PCP Doctors, Warden Solano State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Housh v. Solano State Prison et al
as 2:2018cv03271
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Housh
Defendant:
Solano State Prison, Bryan Cleary, R. Dubruyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Warren v. Arnold, et al.
as 2:2018cv03109
Defendant:
Justin, C. Bayoneta, Mitchel and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Raymond Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Andrews v. Russo, et al.
as 2:2018cv02891
Defendant:
RN Russo, Solano State Prison, D. Pong Yan and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon James Michael Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Andrews v. Russo, et al.
as 1:2018cv01475
Defendant:
RN Russo, Solano State Prison, D. Pong Yan and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon James Michael Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Warden Solano State Prison et al
as 5:2018cv01447
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Raymond Warren
Defendant:
Warden Solano State Prison and Maya Norberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Everidge et al
as 5:2017cv06463
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrone Garrison
Defendant:
Brett Everidge, Berkeley Adult Parole Office Supervisor, Vallejo Adult Parole Office Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Solano State Prison
as 2:2017cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eutimio Lopez
Defendant:
Solano State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Solano State Prison, et al.
as 2:2015cv02259
Plaintiff:
Jamie E. Canada
Defendant:
Solano State Prison and Counselor CCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
