Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Seales v. Reese et al
as 4:2013cv01696
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Diane E. Reese, Three Parole Officers and Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seales v. Hiawatha et al
as 4:2013cv00373
Defendant:
Irving Hiawatha, Nicole D. Nash, Kevin Eckhuff and others
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seales v. Scaife
as 4:2012cv02375
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Dewayne Scaife
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seales v. Warden of Potosi Correctional Center
as 4:2012cv02237
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden of Potosi Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seales v. United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
as 4:2012cv02084
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soloman Seales, Jr. v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 12-3603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, George A. Lombardi, Director of Department of Corrections and Lisa Jones, Constituent Service Officer
Seales v. Nixon et al
as 4:2012cv01829
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon, George A. Lombardi and Lisa Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seales v. Missouri State Probation and Parole Board
as 4:2012cv01781
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Missouri State Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seales v. Each Psychologist at PCC et al
as 4:2012cv01186
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Each Psychologist at PCC, Each Psychiatrist at PCC, Each Doctor and Nurse at PCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seales v. Landrum
as 4:2012cv01181
Plaintiff:
Soloman Seales, Jr.
Defendant:
Terrish Landrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
