Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11929
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heyns, Tom Combs and others
Knop v. Warren et al
as 2:2014cv10185
Plaintiff:
Lori Knop
Defendant:
Millicent Warren, Daniel Heyns, Sylvia McQueen and others
Eugene Szymanski v. Michael Eagen, et al
as 13-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE SZYMANSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. EAGEN, SONIA WARCHOCK and MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD
Eugene Szymanski v. Michael Eagen, et al
as 13-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE SZYMANSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. EAGEN, SONIA WARCHOCK and MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD
Thorp #495722 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2012cv01060
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon Thorp #495722
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Amy Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Lytal, et al v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM LYTAL and PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson State of Michigan Parole Board, JAMES ATTERBERRY, Member, CHARLES L. BROWN, Member and others
Szymanski v. Eagen et al
as 2:2012cv12067
Plaintiff:
Eugene Szymanski
Defendant:
Michael C Eagen, Sonia Warchock and Michigan Parole Board
Chambers #095405 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers #095405
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Granholm et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv14761
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Nelson #451880 v. Atterberry et al
as 1:2010cv01010
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Nelson #451880
Defendant:
James Atterberry, Sharee Booker, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
