Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Donald Lempar v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 16-20731
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD LEMPAR
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, ALLEN HIGHTOWER, GLENDA ADAMS and others
Donald Lempar v. Brad Livingston
as 14-20263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Lempar
Defendant / Appellee:
Brad Livingston, Allen Hightower, Glenda Adams and others
Donald Lempar v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-20263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LEMPAR
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, ALLEN HIGHTOWER, GLENDA ADAMS and others
Donald Lempar v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-20257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LEMPAR
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, ALLEN HIGHTOWER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, GLENDA ADAMS, M.D., North Region Medical Director, University of Texas Medical Branch-C.M.H.C. Division and others
Lempar v. Livingston et al
as 4:2013cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donald Lempar
Defendant:
Brad Livingston , Allen Hightower , Glenda Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Lempar v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 11-20182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LEMPAR
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, ALLEN HIGHTOWER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, GLENDA ADAMS, M.D., North Region Medical Director, University of Texas Medical Branch-C.M.H.C. Division and others
Lempar v. Livingston et al
as 4:2010cv02983
Plaintiff:
Donald Lempar
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Allen Hightower, Glenda Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Bickham et al
as 4:2008cv02577
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Hopkins
Defendant:
Phillip O. Bickham , Latunja M. Jones and Sonie Mangum
Amicu:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
