Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv10075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wolfe et al v. Enochian BioSciences Denmark ApS et al
as 2:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Rene Sindlev, Enochian BioSciences, Inc., Henrik Gronfeldt-Sorensen and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wolfe and Crossfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00521
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
In Re: Luis Javier Martinez Sa
as 20-29
Respondent:
Silver Point Capital, L.P., David Reganato, Contrarian Capital Management, LLC and others
Appellee:
Luis Javier Martinez Sampedro
In Re: Luis Javier Martinez Sa
as 20-8
Respondent:
Norman Raul Sorensen Valdez, Contrarian Capital Management, LLC, David Reganato and others
Appellee:
Luis Javier Martinez Sampedro
In Re: Luis Javier Martinez Sa
as 19-4339
Respondent / Appellee:
Silver Point Capital, L.P., David Reganato, Contrarian Capital Management, LLC and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Luis Javier Martinez Sampedro
In Re: Luis Javier Martinez Sa
as 19-272
Undetermined:
Contrarian Capital Management, LLC, Silver Point Capital, L.P., David Reganato and others
Appellee:
Luis Javier Martinez Sampedro
In Re: Luis Javier Martinez Sa
as 19-273
Respondent:
Norman Raul Sorensen Valdez
Undetermined:
Contrarian Capital Management, LLC, David Reganato and Silver Point Capital, L.P.
Appellee:
Luis Javier Martinez Sampedro
Sorensen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv06028
Plaintiff:
James B Sorensen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
