Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sorensen v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv05695
Plaintiff:
Grace Sorensen
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv04707
Plaintiff:
Alice Sorensen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01383
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Sorensen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08642
Plaintiff:
Darlene Sorensen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03669
Plaintiff:
Linda I. Sorensen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30386
Plaintiff:
Marie L. Sorensen and Gary Sorensen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv26816
Plaintiff:
Janette Sorensen and Todd Sorensen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen v. Mentor Worldwide LLC
as 2:2014cv11228
Plaintiff:
June M. Sorensen and Jeffrey Sorsensen
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Del Rosario Lozano et al. v. American Medical Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30405
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Lozano , Cheryl Hardesty , Cheryl Loughry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorensen et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv19182
Plaintiff:
Melody G. Sorensen and Jeff Sorensen
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
