Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Byrne v. Sotheby's, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05950
Plaintiff:
Carol Lynn Byrne
Defendant:
Sotheby's, Inc., Sotheby's, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan Administrative Committee and Sotheby's, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan f/k/a Sotheby's, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan, No. 38-2478406-002
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Sokolskyfilm, Inc. v. Sotheby's, Inc.
as 1:2025cv04918
Plaintiff:
Sokolskyfilm, Inc.
Defendant:
Sotheby's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Carlo Croce v. Sotheby's Financial Services, Inc., et al
as 25-3176
Plaintiff:
CARLO M. CROCE
Defendant:
SOTHEBY'S FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and SOTHEBY'S, INC.
Sotheby's, Inc. v. Beck et al
as 1:2024cv05081
Plaintiff:
Sotheby's, Inc.
Defendant:
Catherine Anne Beck and Jack Ditkofsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Augusto Reyes Jr v. Sothebys Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03371
Plaintiff:
Augusto Reyes
Defendant:
Sothebys, Inc., John Doe 1 and Does 2 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Su v. Sotheby's Inc.
as 24-653
Plaintiff:
WEI SU and HAI JUAN WANG
Defendant:
YEO HWANG YEH and SOTHEBY'S INC.
Swan v. Sotheby's Inc.
as 23-7912
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHYLLIS SWAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SOTHEBY'S INC. and ROBERT EVERETT PAGE, IV
Free Holdings, Inc. v. McCoy
as 23-644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Free Holdings, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin McCoy and Sotheby's Inc.
Defendant:
Nameless Corporation and Alex Amsel
Swan v. Sotheby's Inc et al
as 1:2022cv10406
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Swan
Defendant:
Sotheby's Inc and Robert Everett Page IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 co Diversity-Conversion
Nathan Smith v. Pyrorcashman LLP, et al
as 22-56035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
PYRORCASHMAN LLP, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, BONHAMS AND BUTTERFIELDS AUCTIONEERS CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
