Cases 21 - 30 of 129
AMITA HEALTH MERCY MEDICAL CENTER AURORA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
D.W. MCMILLAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03828
Plaintiff:
LANCASTER HOSPITAL CORPORATION doing business as PALMDALE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as LANCASTER HOSPITAL, HRI HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as HRI HOSPITAL also known as HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE, UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. doing business as SOUTHERN CRESCENT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM also known as ANCHOR HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
VIRTUA WEST JERSEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03360
Plaintiff:
HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO LLC, HUMC OPCO LLC, VIRTUA WEST JERSEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC. and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SPRINGS et al. v. BRAITHWAITE et al.
as 1:2020cv03244
Defendant:
KENNETH J. BRAITHWAITE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SPRINGS and NATHANIEL REESE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
District Hospital Partners, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UHS-Corona, Inc., doing business as Corona Regional Medical Center, Lancaster Hospital Corporation, doing business as Lancaster Community Hospital, UHS of Oklahoma, Inc., doing business as St. Mary's Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Lee Memorial Hospital, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lee Memorial Hospital, University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital, formerly known as Memorial Health System Colorado Springs, Gulf Coast Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Allina Health, 13cv775 ; 13cv776, for the benefit of Abbott Northwestern Hospital, for the benefit of Mercy Hospital, for the benefit of Owatonna Hospital, for the benefit of St. Francis Regional Medical Center, for the benefit of Buffalo Hospital, f, Banner Health, for the benefit of North Colorado Medical Center, for the benefit of Banner Gateway Medical Center, for the benefit of Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, for the benefit of Banner Thunderbird Medical Center, for the benefit of Banne, Billings Clinic and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 20-1106
Petitioner:
Placid Refining Company LLC, Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., U.S. Oil & Refining Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
PCS SALES (USA), INC. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00488
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
PCS SALES (USA), INC., AGRIUM (U.S.), INC., WHITE SPRINGS AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
