Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Jackson v. Norman et al
as 1:2012cv08876
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman Jackson
Defendant:
Lillie Norman, Clarence Norman, Rhoda Patnetlli Norma Williams Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sprint Communications Company L.P. et al v. Jasco Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05048
Defendant:
Yehudah Bodek, Jasco Trading, Inc., Alan Savdie and others
Plaintiff:
Boost Worldwide, Inc., Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sprint Communications Company LP et al v. Discount Cellular Plus, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04068
Defendant:
Discount Cellular Plus, Inc., Yanky Katz, Yoel Stossel and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company LP and Sprint Nextel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norman v. Caretakers of the Constitution et al
as 1:2011cv06831
Defendant:
Caretakers of the Constitution, The United States Government, Colleet Corbin and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vormwald et al v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P et al
as 5:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
David Vormwald , Denise DellaRocco and Virginia Pilleskey
Defendant:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P, Qwest Communications Company, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooklyn 13th Street Holding Corp. v. Sprint Communications Company LP
as 1:2011cv00291
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn 13th Street Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Sprint Communications Company LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hecht v. Nextel Of New York et al
as 1:2010cv08740
Plaintiff:
Alisa Hecht
Defendant:
Nextel Of New York, Sprint Communications Corp. and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
