Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTRELL v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00600
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asea/Afscme Local 52 Health Benefits Trust v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2017cv06704
Plaintiff:
Asea/Afscme Local 52 Health Benefits Trust
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Niazi, Imran v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Imran Niazi
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Mikesell et al v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
Ron Mikesell and Beverly Mikesell
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roper v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mary Roper
Defendant:
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2016cv00041
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
MILES THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
as 1:2016cv00294
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
MILES THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCAIN v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
as 1:2015cv01390
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MCCAIN
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
