Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant: TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
Empls Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 21-3993
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Defendant: CHARLES E. JONES
Defendant / Appellant: FIRSTENERGY CORP and FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Robert Price v. St. Louis Corr Facility, et al
as 21-2983
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT PRICE
Defendant / Appellee: ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Medical and COUNTY OF MONTCALM, MI, Department of Corrections
Jennifer Miller v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 21-3854
Plaintiff / Appellee: JENNIFER L. MILLER, Derivatively on behalf of other FirstEnergy Corporation
Intervenor / Appellee: LOCAL 103, ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, I.B.E.W., EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, et al.
Defendant / Appellant: FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION, Nominal Defendant and FIRSTENERGY CORP., Nominal Defendant
Akno 1010 Market Street St. Lo v. Nahid Pourtaghi
as 21-2959
Plaintiff / Appellant: AKNO 1010 MARKET STREET ST. LOUIS MISSOURI LLC
Defendant / Appellee: NAHID POURTAGHI
Robert Price v. St. Louis Corr Facility, et al
as 21-2934
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT PRICE
Defendant / Appellee: ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Medical and COUNTY OF MONTCALM, MI, Department of Corrections
The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement v. Anderson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv05529
Defendant: Thomas N Mitchell, K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones and others
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement
Intervenor: Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. and Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv00705
Defendant: Charles E Jones, Steven E. Strah, Steven J. Demetriou and others
Plaintiff: Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv04813
Defendant: Charles E Jones, James F O'Neil, III, Steven E. Strah and others
Plaintiff: Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Petitioner: Massachusetts Laborer Pension Fund Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp
Interested Party: City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement
Consolidated Plaintiff: Roberta Bloom, James Atherton, Arlene Pogolowitz and others
Consolidated Defendant: John Does 1-50
Not Classified By Court: Edward Orr, Todd Augenbaum and John Donovan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
City of Chicago, IL, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4183
Petitioner: CITY OF TUMWATER, WA, CITY OF DENVER, CO AND DENVER COUNTY, CO, CITY OF LACEY, WA and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified: NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVSION ASSOCIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?