Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Midwest Petroleum Company et al v. St Louis County
as 4:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Midwest Petroleum Company, Wallis Companies, Inc., Spirit Energy, LLC, and others
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Vaughn v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
William Vaughn and Mosias
Defendant:
Tim Fitch, Saint Louis County Assessor, State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midland States Bank v. Ygrene Energy Fund Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00354
Defendant:
St. Louis County Clean Energy Development Board, St. Louis County, Mark R. Devore, in his official capacity as St. Louis County Collector of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Midland States Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc. et al v. Parson et al
as 2:2019cv04155
Defendant:
MD, FACP Marc K Taormina, DO James A DiRenna, Jeffrey S Glaser and others
Plaintiff:
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc. and DO, MSCI, FACOG Colleen P. McNicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josephine Havlak Photographer, et al v. Village of Twin Oaks, et al
as 16-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Josephine Havlak Photographer, Inc. and Josephine Havlak
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Hill and Mary Katherine Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Village of Twin Oaks and Kathy Runge, Village of Twin Oaks Clerk/Controller in her offical capacity only
Defendant:
John Belmar, St. Louis County Police Chief in his official capacity only
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission v. Uber, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission
Defendant:
Uber, Inc. , Uber Technologies, Inc. , John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Feder et al v. City of East St. Louis, Illinois et al
as 3:2014cv00761
Plaintiff:
Paul Feder , Denise Durako , Latricia Sanders and others
Defendant:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois , Alvin Parks and Blue Line Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant:
Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al
as 11-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri and Tim Fitch, in his official capacity as Chief of the St. Louis County, Missouri, Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
