Cases 1 - 10 of 251
BECK v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
STACEY MICHELLE BECK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Webster v. Troup et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Stacey Webster
Defendant:
Davonna Troup and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LUMBERMANS MERCHANDISING CORPORATION v. STACEY HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01111
Counter Defendant:
LUMBERMANS MERCHANDISING CORPORATION
Counter Claimant:
STACEY HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Klein v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Stacey Klein
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MANGEL v. COMMUNICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN et al
as 2:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
STACEY MANGEL
Defendant:
COMMUNICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN and UMR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
