Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Donald v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Clairmont Donald
Defendant:
Superintendent Stacie Bennett, P. Paige-Connier, Dr. Mikhail Gusman, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv02696
Plaintiff:
Howard Morris
Defendant:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahaman v. Bennett
as 9:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Cendno Rahaman
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gunn v. Bennett
as 9:2023cv01268
Petitioner:
Darrell Gunn
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahaman v. Bennett
as 9:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Cendno Rahaman
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Bennett
as 1:2023cv04219
Petitioner:
Jamahl Clarke
Respondent:
Ms. Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Bennett
as 6:2023cv06284
Petitioner:
Brian K. Bagley
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Bennett
as 1:2023cv03762
Petitioner:
Howard Morris
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker et al v. New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlton Walker and Jermell Mclean
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Brian Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Bennett
as 9:2022cv01234
Petitioner:
Brian Montanez
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
