Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Redford v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center et al
as 4:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
Earl Redford
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center, Billy Byrd, Gov State of Okla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 4:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
Vanessa McFadden
Defendant:
Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners , Stanley Glanz , Tim Albin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Birdwell v. Glanz et al
as 4:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Scott W Birdwell
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Unknown Nurse #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Glanz
as 4:2015cv00153
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Stanley Glanz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennial v. Glanz
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Earl Stanley Tennial
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Glanz et al
as 4:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tony D Davis
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz and Shannon Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morittz v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00656
Plaintiff:
Autumn Dawn Morittz
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Glanz et al
as 4:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
Destiny Holland
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunham v. Gable et al
as 4:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
Damon Dunham
Defendant:
Gable, Kathy Loehr and Stanley Glanz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
