Cases 1 - 10 of 23
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYALS v. MURPHREE et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
DELACY A RYALS
Defendant:
NATALIE MURPHREE, JOEL STANTON and Corporal EARL OSBON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANTON v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
as 3:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
BRIAN STANTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MUDD v. JONES et al
as 4:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
DAWUAN TERRELL MUDD and DIVINE SERENITY MOON
Defendant:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, SGT JUAN USQUIANO, LT PERNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00113
Defendant:
LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 5:2018cv00372
Defendant:
OFFICER LAWRENCE, OFFICER STANTON and OFFICER WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
DANTE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
