Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Keith Farmer v. Bledsoe Cnty, TN, et al
as 19-6175
Defendant:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, TDOC, TONY PARKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEANNE SHEPPARD and PAUL NINER
Keith Farmer v. Bledsoe Cnty, TN, et al
as 19-6171
Defendant:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, TDOC, TONY PARKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEANNE SHEPPARD and PAUL NINER
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Michael Parris, Brandon Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Jamon Robinson and Corey Alan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parris et al
as 3:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Robert Gibson, Michael Parris, Bubba and others
Plaintiff:
Jamon Robinson and Corey Alan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Hill et al
as 3:2019cv00165
Defendant:
Corizon Corp., Ken Hutchinson, Stanton Heidle, III and others
Plaintiff:
William Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Stanton Heidle, III
Plaintiff:
William Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Parish et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Tony Parker, M Monkhouse, Michael Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00399
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett, Ezra Shelton, Deangelo Montez Moody and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Michael Parris, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett and Stavon Riley
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Brandon Maloney, Korey Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby-Frazier v. Phillips et al
as 3:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Adam Dansby-Frazier
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Stanton Heidle and Ken Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
