Cases 1 - 10 of 1,283
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination)
Starbucks Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
as 24-11643
Petitioner:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Torres v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 1:2024cv03945
Plaintiff:
Kelvys Salas Torres
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company, Jane Does 1-10 and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
NLRB v. Starbucks Corporation
as 24-1145
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation, d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
