Cases 51 - 60 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv09102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
George et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2019cv06185
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Leach, Chelsea Maley, Lisa Jame and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Fox et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2019cv04650
Plaintiff:
Jill Shwiner, Rafael Fox and Paul D'Auria
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bodum Holding AG et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2019cv04280
Plaintiff:
Bodum USA, Inc., Bodum Holding AG, Bodum AG and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Roberts v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2019cv02633
Plaintiff:
Ken Roberts
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Georgy v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00656
Plaintiff:
MARY GEORGY
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hartofelis et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2018cv05642
Plaintiff:
Constantine M Hartofelis, Kelly Hartofelis and Constantine M. Hartofelis
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hartofelis et al v. Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks
as 1:2018cv05642
Plaintiff:
Constantine M Hartofelis and Kelly Hartofelis
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Marten v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2018cv09201
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Marten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
