Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,702
Weaver (ID 112321) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03073
Plaintiff: Dalton Tyler Weaver
Defendant: Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections, Shannon Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner: Frankie Maldonado
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff: Earl Chino
Defendant: Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner: Damon Lee Mink
Respondent: Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff: George Ortiz
Defendant: Alisha Tafoya, New Mexico State Parole Board, FNU Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman et al v. State of New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff: Zachary Hoffman, David T. Hernandez, Randy Lopez and others
Defendant: State of New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant: Alisha Tafoya, GCCF Staff and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Christian
as 24-6092
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES CORNELIUS CHRISTIAN
Spalding v. United States
as 24-6091
Petitioner: DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Hume (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff: Coalin Joshua Hume
Defendant: People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?