Cases 1 - 10 of 442
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garth v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lady B. Garth
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen, Mississippi, Charles Scott, Monroe County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and City of Union, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and Mississippi Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moslow et al v. City Of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
David Warran Moslow, Jr. and Suzanne Moslow
Defendant:
City Of Southaven, Mississippi, Southaven Police Department, Former Police Chief Macon Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury Venue
Moore v. MS State IRS et al
as 3:2023cv03176
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
MS State IRS and DOJ etc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Joiner v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Latoya Joiner
Defendant:
William King, Arthur James, Jeremy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
