Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
Smith v. Office of the Governor, State of Utah et al
as 2:2018cv00846
Defendant:
Dennis James, Office of the Secretary of State State of Utah, Weber County and others
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Office of the Governor, State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Dennis James, Peace Officer's Standard and Training Council, Idaho, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Ada County, Cassia County, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Inmate Bank et al
as 1:2017cv02751
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Fletcher
Defendant:
Inmate Bank, State Controller, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark DuRoss v. California State Prison, et al
as 17-16039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY DUROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor and JOHN CHIANG, State Controller
Dion Anderson v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 14-15119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DION ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor, CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE, DEBRA BOWEN, California Secretary of State and others
Grimes v. State Controllers Office
as 3:2012cv06278
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
State Controllers Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
