Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 109
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Other: Brad Greenspan
Buckeye Power, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1317
Petitioner: Buckeye Power, Inc. and Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Agency
Intervenor: Appalachian Mountain Club, Ohio Environmental Council and Sierra Club
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, New York City, State of Connecticut and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
Kinder Morgan, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 23-1181
Petitioner: Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Intervenor: State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Westmoreland Mining Holdings v. EPA
as 20-1160
Petitioner: Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation, Montana Environmental Information Center and others
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2020cv02529
Defendant: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, COSMO SERVIDIO, ANDREW WHEELER and others
Plaintiff: MARYLAND WATERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC., CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC., ROBERT WHITESCARVER and others
Petitioner: STATE OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?