Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2020cv02529
Defendant: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, COSMO SERVIDIO, ANDREW WHEELER and others
Plaintiff: MARYLAND WATERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC., CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC., ROBERT WHITESCARVER and others
Petitioner: STATE OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al v. FERRIERO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00242
Defendant: DAVID S. FERRIERO
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Petitioner: NEBRASKA, LOUISIANA, ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Not Classified By Court: LEANNE LITTRELL DILORENZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv01181
Defendant: ALEX AZAR, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STEPHEN M. HAHN and others
Plaintiff: SHERMAN GROUP HOLDINGS LLC and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: PUBLIC HEALTH LAW CENTER, PUBLIC CITIZEN, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE OF MARYLAND et al v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2020cv02530
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant: ANDREW WHEELER, COSMO SERVIDIO and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Petitioner: STATE OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner: FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION et al v. TMTE, INC. et al
as 1:2020mc00094
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL and others
Defendant: TMTE, INC., LUCAS THOMAS ERB, LUKE ASHER and others
Receiver: KELLY CRAWFORD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?