Other Statutes Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moates v. State of North Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00772
Plaintiff: Michael Moates
Defendant: State of North Carolina, State of Texas, State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. State of Texas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff: John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant: Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party: Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant: Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent: Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
State of Arizona et al v. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) et al
as 3:2016cv00274
Plaintiff: State of Arizona , State Of Texas , State of Oklahoma and others
Defendant: National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , United States Department of Commerce and others
Amicu: Internet Association, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00731
Plaintiff: State of Nevada , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Thomas E Perez, Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor The and others
Consol_plaintiff: Plano Chamber of Commerce , Texas Association of Business , Allen-Fairview Chamber of Commerce and others
Consol_defendant: Thomas E Perez , David Weil and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff: State of Nevada , State Of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Thomas E. Perez, The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States Of America et al v. DeVry, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00843
Defendant: American University of the Caribbean, Chamberlain College of Nursing, DeVry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
USA, ex rel. Steury v. State of California, et al.
as 4:2007cv01705
Plaintiff: United States of America , Leslie Steury , State of California and others
Defendant: Cardinal Health, Inc. , Cardinal Health 303, Inc and Cardinal Health Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?