Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. The State of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Erick Anthony Santos
Respondent:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Federal Tribunal et al
as 7:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Defendant:
Federal Tribunal, The United States of America, The State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Singleton v. State of Virginia
as 1:2022cv01109
Petitioner:
Cornelius Singleton
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. State of Virginia's English Constru Co.
as 7:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Eric Evan Miller
Defendant:
State of Virginia's English Constru. Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
as 1:2021cv00915
Petitioner:
Alexander Cameron
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Justice v. State of Virginia et al
as 3:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Justice
Defendant:
Attorney General of Virginia and State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrington v. State of Virginia et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Respondent:
City of Suffolk and State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lacey v. State Of Virginia
as 1:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Lacey
Defendant:
State Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
