Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant: Roberta Reardon, Grandview Brokerage, Inc., Isaac Muller and others
Plaintiff: Oriska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Oriska Corporation v. Bay Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00762
Defendant: Bay Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Howard Belford and others
Plaintiff: Oriska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Bay Park Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC et. al. v. Philipson et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv06291
Defendant: Donna Hodge, Annette Hall, Karen Grant Williams and Alexi Arias, Deborah Philipson, Avi Philipson and others
Plaintiff: Bay Park Center for Nursing & Re abilitation LLC d/b/a Bay Park Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC, Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Heath Care Center LLC d/b/a Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Health Care Center LLC,, South Point Plaza Nursing and Rehabilitation Center doing business as Bayview Manor LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oriska Corporation, and Oriska Corporation
Intervenor Defendant: Home Attendant Services of Hyde Park, New Carlton Rehab & Nursing Center, Prokeep Inc. and others
Respondent: James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Walton v. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York et al
as 5:2018cv01428
Defendant: The Research Foundation for the State University of New York and The State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Plaintiff: Amber Walton and Amber Hansel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
diPierro v. State University of New York at Stony Brook et al
as 2:2017cv03544
Defendant: State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook Family and Preventive Medicine Services, University Faculty Practice Corporation, Stony Brook Occupational Medicine, University Faculty Practice Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Charles diPierro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodgers v. Faculty-Student Association of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02466
Defendant: Faculty-Student Association of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Inc. and Michael West
Plaintiff: Michael Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Parrish v. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
as 2:2016cv05837
Plaintiff: Maryann Parrish
Defendant: The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Madden v. Bewley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00571
Plaintiff: Glen J. Madden
Defendant: Thomas G. Bewley, TIAA-CREF Individual and Institutional Services, LLC and The Research Foundation of the State University of New York
Counter_claimant: The Research Foundation of the State University of New York
Counter_defendant: Glen J. Madden
Cross_claimant: The Research Foundation of the State University of New York
Cross_defendant: Thomas G. Bewley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Popat v. Levy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01052
Plaintiff: Saurin Popat, M.D.
Defendant: Elad Levy, M.D., The State University of New York at Buffalo, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Bioscience and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?