Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: Samsung Top-Load
as 20-6097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS MORGAN
Amicus Curiae:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 16-8069
Intervenor / Appellee:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE, STATE OF UTAH and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Respondent:
SALLY JEWELL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, FORMER OFFICIALS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF WYOMING and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF COLORADO, THE STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Intervenor:
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
State of Wyoming, et al v. Zinke, et al
as 16-8068
Intervenor:
CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALASKA, FORMER OFFICIALS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE, STATE OF UTAH and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Respondent:
NEIL KORNZE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, RYAN ZINKE and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF COLORADO, THE STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
WildEarth Guardians v. Lane, et al
as 13-2001
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COALITION OF ARIZONA/NEW MEXICO COUNTIES FOR STABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, NEW MEXICO TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION, NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM MCCLINTIC, Chairman of the New Mexico State Game Commission, sed in his official capacity and SCOTT BIDEGAIN, Chairman of the New Mexico State Game Commission
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant:
JAMES LANE, Director of the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, sued in his official capacity
Hobbs v. Zenderman, et al
as 08-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEFFAN HOBBS, by and through his parents and next friends, JIMMY and JANET HOBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHA ZENDERMAN, JOEY KELLENAERS and PAMELA HYDE, Secretary of the Department of Human Services, all in their individual and official capacities
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Not A Party In Lower Court - Amicus Curiae:
SPECIAL NEEDS ALLIANCE, NEW MEXICO CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ELDER LAW ATTORNEYS and NEW MEXICO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
