Cases 1 - 4 of 4
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Lignite Energy Council and Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. and State of Minnesota, By and through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of North Dakota, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 15-15894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF ARIZONA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Energy and Environment Cabinet and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and REGINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
STATES OF NEBRASKA, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, IDAHO, INDIANA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN AND WYOMING.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI
Landry et al v. Laney Directional Drilling Co. et al
as 3:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
Chad Landry and Jeanne Burns
Defendant:
Laney Directional Drilling Co. and State of Louisiana, Department of Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
