Cases 1 - 10 of 915
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
Blake v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tony Kent Blake
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Parks, Choctaw County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villasana v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Joe Luis Villasana
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Park, Choctaw County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindamood v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Lindamood
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Park, Choctaw County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. doing business as Donnell Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al.
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Ledbetter
as 6:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01096
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Hunter
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
